So, I guess this is my first blog post. (Captain Obvious has reported for duty.)
Does anyone else feel slightly awkward doing this? No? Just me? …‘kay.
Despite spending quite a bit of time ruminating on this subject, I admit to being a little lost for words. (Watch this turn into a 1,000+ word post.) In many ways, I feel as if this topic is rather pointless.
When I say pointless, I’m not implying that the question of how to handle history/education is at all unimportant, quite the opposite in fact. I merely believe that things will continue to go on as they have always gone on. What ever group holds the power will tell the story from their perspective. Who controls the present DOES, in my opinion, control the past. And who controls the past DOES control the future. After all, how better to influence the next generation than through interpretation and/or manipulation of the past? At least until “[the High loses] either their belief in themselves, or their capacity to govern efficiently, or both. They are then overthrown by the Middle, who enlist the Low on their side…. As soon as they have reached their objective, the Middle thrust the Low back into their old position of servitude, and themselves become the High. Presently a new Middle splits off…and the struggle begins again.” (1984 p.166) Gee, thanks, Mr. Orwell!
The fact that further representation of minority groups in history is even becoming an issue is a sign of the shifting of power the world. Through innovations in both transportation and communication, the world is both shrinking and growing. It is getting easier and easier to travel further and further, making the physical distance between Discourses (U C WUT I DID THAR??? ;{D ) shrink relative to time. Conversely, by being able to more easily interact with a higher number of Discourses, our perceptions of the world around us are being forced to expand, or at least acknowledge, the perceptions of others. (The “our” and “us” I speak of are all human beings as a whole of individuals. The “others” refers to the instinctual distinction all human beings draw when encountering someone outside our the Discourse we are intimate with)
If I may be allowed a slight change in subject, I would like to address something I said in class on Wednesday. I have not heard any complaints, but I just wanted to clarify my stance in regards to race relations in history. I certainly hope that no one inferred from my little shpeel on Wednesday that I believe bigotry and ignorance to be traits especially inherent to those gosh-darn Caucasoids. I’m not so foolish! Bigotry and ignorance are universal because fear is universal and I know that had African tribes stormed Europe and raped Europe of its resources or Native Americans sailed across the Atlantic and “discovered” Spain, we would be debating similar social/ethical/political/economic gray areas today. Only the role of the players would be different. If there is one thing growing up biracial has taught me it’s that neither good nor bad is race specific. I just feel that’s it’s important to ask the hard questions like “Who is the ‘us’ in American History?”, to challenge the status quo. Even if a status quo will always exist, i think it’s important that we acknowledge it’s existence.
558 words. Not too shabby, wot wot! C];{D
Oh wait. 569.

ah. cami. i decided to comment on your blog. feel special. :]
ReplyDeletewell anyways. i actually agreed with this shindig that was 569 words long. it made sense and you backed up your views. kudos. i like how you brought in 1984. Thanks for reassuring my belief; i also thought it was/is rather pointless debating such topic because no one will win. okay that's somewhat of a lie because there is a temporary "winner"
okay here's one thing i would like to discuss: the race issue. i would like to know who you think the "us" is. does that sentence make sense? i just reread that and it seems..oh whatever. anyways. i know not being the stereotypical American means that we weren't raised like other children (by we i mean us two because yeah i thnk you know what im getting at...). So would it be that we are open to more interpretations and see the hodgepog of people and appreciate it? (if this rambling doesn't make sense let me know)
VERY NICE!
ReplyDelete:)
CAMMY... your blog was very interserting to read. ( sign or was it...lol!!) I really liked it when you discussed "we" or "us" because honestly like you said who is "we"? Everyone comes from a differnt back around and we all have different beliefs. Like me for example, my ancestors did not come on a boat to this country and i know that for a fact. Discourse community ehh? MUY BIEN! I totally agree with you, when we go or talk to someone who belongs to the different discourse community we learn soo much. Take me and you, we come from different communities yet we have learned soo much from each other.
PEACE
;)
So pretty much you are amazing at blog writing. haha. i love that you brought up your view again on cultures being introduced in the history books more because you are totally right. I think that a lot of other cultures did do a lot for our country to make who we are. Also, love that yu used that quote from 1984. So right! Our country is like going in circles with the classes. I love also how you brought your AMAZING humor in the blog. Great too. Altogether, it was very put together and might I mention again, awesome. :)
ReplyDelete-megan w.
Hello camille...lol
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog.
I agree with you and Gaby, this is a very pointless issue to debate because there is never going to be a winner. I like how you related this topic with 1984 and it made me realize that I didn't do that on my blog :/
Well anyways, I love the question "Who is the US in American history?" I like it becuase it is pretty much the source of this debate. People from all different backgrounds are part of American History, this is why it would be unfair to erase figures that have made a difference in people's lives because of their believes. Well enough of that lol
I like the way you keep people wanting to read your blog and I look forward to the next one :)
Cami, you have reperesented what I view to be a totally realistic view point. I agree entirely with what you have said. In my onpinion, you are right that history is controlled by whomever is in power at that moment in time. For example, in American society today this is evident. When we, as Americans have a Republican or Denocrat as a president, we see the shift in power to either side. The white house will be more biased to that party. I believe this is much like what you are saying in your blog. Anyways, you had a very efficient blog!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your blog. I agree with you and Gaby, this issue is very a pointless thing to debate because there is never going to be a winner. I like how you related this topic with 1984. I love the question you asked, "Who is the US in American history?" We are all from different backgrounds and every part is a major part of American History.
ReplyDeleteI also agree that history is controlled by whomever is in power at a certain time. For example, whenever a Democrat or a republican is a president, you can see a change in power.
Your blog was was very good cami, nice job.